Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMwenzwa, Ezekiel
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-28T09:59:14Z
dc.date.available2015-07-28T09:59:14Z
dc.date.issued2012-01
dc.identifier.issn2229-712X
dc.identifier.urihttp://karuspace.karu.ac.ke/handle/20.500.12092/1907
dc.description.abstractKenya is administratively divided into forty-seven (47) counties each of which shall be under the stewardship of a County Governor once the new constitution is finally implemented. These officers shall be tasked with the coordination of governance and development in the respective administrative areas. Like specific country Heads of State in the case of New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD), County Governors shall be regarded as peers and hence accountable to both the government and the local community for any development activities. In the NEPAD development thinking, specific countries are required to undertake in-house reviews of their development policies and performance in governance, human rights and social service provision among others. The resultant data are presented to other African Heads of State and Government for peer review and the particular Head of State/Government made to answer for any development shortcomings. Similarly, to improve governance and accountability of leaders in areas under their purview, County Governors in Kenya could be subjected to the same peer review, hence NEPAD from below. This paper examines the APRM philosophy as a development archetype and argues for its intra-country domestication in Kenya focusing on the Countyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipKaratina Universityen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElixiren_US
dc.subjectCounty Governmenten_US
dc.subjectDomesticationen_US
dc.subjectDevelopmenten_US
dc.subjectGovernanceen_US
dc.subjectPeer reviewen_US
dc.titleNepad from below: Towards Intra-country Peer Review Mechanism (iprm) in Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record