• Login
    View Item 
    •   Repository Home
    • Research Publications
    • School of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies
    • Department of Natural Resources
    • View Item
    •   Repository Home
    • Research Publications
    • School of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies
    • Department of Natural Resources
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The Biological Assessment and Rehabilitation of the World’s Rivers: An Overview

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Full-text (1.017Mb)
    Date
    2021-01-31
    Author
    Feio, Maria João
    Hughes, Robert M.
    Callisto, Marcos
    Nichols, Susan J.
    Odume, Oghenekaro N.
    Quintella, Bernardo R.
    Kuemmerlen, Mathias
    Aguiar, Francisca C.
    Almeida, Salomé F.P.
    EguíaLis, Perla Alonso
    Arimoro, Francis O.
    Dyer, Fiona J.
    Harding, Jon S.
    Jang, Sukhwan
    Kaufmann, Philip R.
    Lee, Samhee
    Li, Jianhua
    Macedo, Diego R.
    Mendes, Ana
    Mercado-Silva, Norman
    Monk, Wendy
    Nakamura, Keigo
    Ndiritu, George G.
    Ogden, Ralph
    Peat, Michael
    Reynoldson, Trefor B.
    Rios-Touma, Blanca
    Segurado, Pedro
    Yates, Adam G.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The biological assessment of rivers i.e., their assessment through use of aquatic assemblages, integrates the effects of multiple-stressors on these systems over time and is essential to evaluate ecosystem condition and establish recovery measures. It has been undertaken in many countries since the 1990s, but not globally. And where national or multi-national monitoring networks have gathered large amounts of data, the poor water body classifications have not necessarily resulted in the rehabilitation of rivers. Thus, here we aimed to identify major gaps in the biological assessment and rehabilitation of rivers worldwide by focusing on the best examples in Asia, Europe, Oceania, and North, Central, and South America. Our study showed that it is not possible so far to draw a world map of the ecological quality of rivers. Biological assessment of rivers and streams is only implemented officially nation-wide and regularly in the European Union, Japan, Republic of Korea, South Africa, and the USA. In Australia, Canada, China, New Zealand, and Singapore it has been implemented officially at the state/province level (in some cases using common protocols) or in major catchments or even only once at the national level to define reference conditions (Australia). In other cases, biological monitoring is driven by a specific problem, impact assessments, water licenses, or the need to rehabilitate a river or a river section (as in Brazil, South Korea, China, Canada, Japan, Australia). In some countries monitoring programs have only been explored by research teams mostly at the catchment or local level (e.g., Brazil, Mexico, Chile, China, India, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam) or implemented by citizen science groups (e.g., Southern Africa, Gambia, East Africa, Australia, Brazil, Canada). The existing large-extent assessments show a striking loss of biodiversity in the last 2–3 decades in Japanese and New Zealand rivers (e.g., 42% and 70% of fish species threatened or endangered, respectively). A poor condition (below Good condition) exists in 25% of South Korean rivers, half of the European water bodies, and 44% of USA rivers, while in Australia 30% of the reaches sampled were significantly impaired in 2006. Regarding river rehabilitation, the greatest implementation has occurred in North America, Australia, Northern Europe, Japan, Singapore, and the Republic of Korea. Most rehabilitation measures have been related to improving water quality and river connectivity for fish or the improvement of riparian vegetation. The limited extent of most rehabilitation measures (i.e., not considering the entire catchment) often constrains the improvement of biological condition. Yet, many rehabilitation projects also lack pre-and/or post-monitoring of ecological condition, which prevents assessing the success and shortcomings of the recovery measures. Economic constraints are the most cited limitation for implementing monitoring programs and rehabilitation actions, followed by technical limitations, limited knowledge of the fauna and flora and their life-history traits (especially in Africa, South America and Mexico), and poor awareness by decision-makers. On the other hand, citizen involvement is recognized as key to the success and sustainability of rehabilitation projects. Thus, establishing rehabilitation needs, defining clear goals, tracking progress towards achieving them, and involving local populations and stakeholders are key recommendations for rehabilitation projects (Table 1). Large-extent and long-term monitoring programs are also essential to provide a realistic overview of the condition of rivers worldwide. Soon, the use of DNA biological samples and eDNA to investigate aquatic diversity could contribute to reducing costs and thus increase monitoring efforts and a more complete assessment of biodiversity. Finally, we propose developing transcontinental teams to elaborate and improve technical guidelines for implementing biological monitoring programs and river rehabilitation and establishing common Water 2021, 13, 371 3 of 45 financial and technical frameworks for managing international catchments. We also recommend providing such expert teams through the United Nations Environment Program to aid the extension of biomonitoring, bioassessment, and river rehabilitation knowledge globally.
    URI
    https://karuspace.karu.ac.ke/handle/20.500.12092/2505
    Collections
    • Department of Natural Resources [50]

    Karatina University copyright © 2017-2019  | Powered by DSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | OAI-PMH Compliant
    Theme by Systems Librarian
      

     

    Browse

    All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Karatina University copyright © 2017-2019  | Powered by DSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | OAI-PMH Compliant
    Theme by Systems Librarian