INFLUENCE OF CONTENT FRAMING ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MEDIA AND AUDIENCE PERCEPTION OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION DISCOURSE IN KENYA
View/ Open
Date
2021Author
MBURU, PAUL KIUMBE
Jinaro, Paul Mburu
Macharia, Juliet
MBURU, PAUL KIUMBE
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Audience perception of wildlife conservation discourse in Kenya has been negative as evidenced in the
results of conservation efforts. The purpose of this study was to interrogate the moderating influence of
media content framing in the relationship between media and audience perception. The study employed
convergent parallel mixed methods design. The population in this study comprised of three groups
namely; sampled media practitioners in three media houses in Kenya; residents living next to national
parks in four out of the eight conservation areas in Kenya as delineated by Kenya Wildlife Service; and
park managers in the four sampled national parks. A questionnaire was administered to 83 human-wildlife
conflict resolution committee members. This generated quantitative data while qualitative data was
generated from interviews with 6 media practitioner, 12 park managers, and Focus Group Discussions
with 4 groups of human-wildlife conflict resolution committee officials each comprising of 8 participants
The study applied both qualitative and quantitative analytical techniques. Results indicated that half (50%)
of the total respondents from the three media houses focus on messages that can solve the conflicts that
exist between wildlife and human beings as a factor when framing wildlife conservation messages
touching on human-wildlife conflict. There was a general perception among participants that the media
tend to emphasize the interests of state (KWS) more than those of the common man, thus the view that
the media cannot fully be trusted to report matters from the perspective of the common man. This
undermines the role of the media in educating the audience to appreciate wildlife and therefore conserve
it. The study concludes that the target audiences are not satisfied with the manner in which these
messages are communicated. As the media highlight the plight of the wildlife, it should equally
communicate the plight of the communities. The study therefore, recommends more training of
journalists and park managers to enhance sensitive flaming and reporting of wildlife conservation
messages.